Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD., v. Avanti Markets, Inc. et al
| Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD., |
| Avanti Markets, Inc. and Continental Cafe, LLC |
| 2:2020cv10395 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD., (Pohl, Elaine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD., against Avanti Markets, Inc., Continental Cafe, LLC. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7603277 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - The Hartford Policy No. 52 SBA RO4664, Effective 2016-2017, #4 Exhibit C - The Hartford Policy No. 52 SBA RO 4664, Effective 2017-2018, #5 Exhibit D - The Hartford Policy No. 52 SBA RO 4664, Effective 2018-2019, #6 Exhibit E - The Hartford Policy No. 52 SBA RO 4664, Effective 2019-2020) (Pohl, Elaine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
