Logicalis, Inc. v. Object Edge, Inc.
Logicalis, Inc. |
Object Edge, Inc. |
2:2020cv10521 |
February 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David M Lawson |
Anthony P Patti |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Directing Defendant to Answer #1 the Complaint. Response due by 5/7/2020. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (MacKay, K) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF HEARING on #7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue and, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue and/or Dismiss Fraud Claim. Motion Hearing set for 8/18/2020 at 3:00 PM before District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference reset for 5/14/2020 at 4:00 PM before District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue and, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue and/or Dismiss Fraud Claim by Object Edge, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Brief in Support, #2 Document Continuation Certificate of Service, #3 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2) (Egan, Dennis) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2020 at 9:00 AM before District Judge David M. Lawson. See image for document deadline. (SPin) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Shawn R. Cioffi on behalf of Object Edge, Inc.. (Cioffi, Shawn) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis K. Egan on behalf of Object Edge, Inc.. (Egan, Dennis) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Object Edge, Inc. waiver sent on 3/3/2020, answer due 5/4/2020. (Frank, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Object Edge, Inc.* (SKra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Logicalis, Inc. against Object Edge, Inc.. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7641658 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: New York County, New York - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Contra Costa County, California. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A) (Frank, Jonathan) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Logicalis, Inc. v. Object Edge, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Logicalis, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jonathan B. Frank |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Object Edge, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Shawn R. Cioffi |
Represented By: | Dennis K. Egan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.