Regency Medical Group, PLLC v. Star Laser, PLLC
Plaintiff: Regency Medical Group, PLLC
Defendant: Star Laser, PLLC
Case Number: 2:2020cv10648
Filed: March 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Referring Judge: Michael J Hluchaniuk
2 Judge: Arthur J Tarnow
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1127
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2020 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #8 Order on Motion for Alternate Service by Regency Medical Group, PLLC (McDaniel, David)
May 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Alternate Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk. (DWor)
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk: #4 MOTION for Alternate Service filed by Regency Medical Group, PLLC. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL AND REASSIGNING CASE from Magistrate Judge David R. Grand to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk. (NAhm)
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand: #4 MOTION for Alternate Service filed by Regency Medical Group, PLLC. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
April 24, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Alternate Service by Regency Medical Group, PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8) (McDaniel, David)
March 16, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Star Laser, PLLC* (SSch)
March 13, 2020 FILING FEE Received in the amount of 400.00 by Regency Medical Group, PLLC - Receipt No. DET129324 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (BHan)
March 11, 2020 Filing 2 Notice of Filing Fee Not Paid. Correction due by 3/18/2020 (LGra)
March 11, 2020 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra)
March 10, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND filed by Regency Medical Group, PLLC against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Fee Required - Fee Not Paid. County of 1st Plaintiff: OAKLAND - County Where Action Arose: OAKLAND - County of 1st Defendant: OAKLAND. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (McDaniel, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Regency Medical Group, PLLC v. Star Laser, PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regency Medical Group, PLLC
Represented By: David S. McDaniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Star Laser, PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?