Oppenheimer v. SoulTracks, LLC et al
| David Oppenheimer |
| Christopher Luke Rizik and SoulTracks, LLC |
| 2:2020cv10913 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Laurie J Michelson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESET Hearing: TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference RESET for 6/11/2020 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EKar) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: On June 4,2020 the parties filed a proposed order (ECF No. #9 ). Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of this Courts Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures, all proposed orders must be submitted as a Word Document via the link under the Utilities section of CM/ECF. The stipulation/propsed order at issue is not in compliance with the rule.As a result, the filing (ECF No. #9 ) is STRICKEN. Issued by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EKar)
|
| Filing 9 [STRICKEN] STIPULATION re #8 Discovery Plan - Rule 26f and Proposed Order on ESI by David Oppenheimer (LeJune, Dana) Modified on 6/5/2020 (EKar). |
| Filing 8 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (LeJune, Dana) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO ATTEND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY PLAN. ( TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for 6/9/2020 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Laurie J. Michelson) Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EKar)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand , ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Christopher Luke Rizik. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Disclosure statement) (Rizik, Michael) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *SoulTracks, LLC* (SKra) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Christopher Luke Rizik* (SKra) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT Corrected filed by David Oppenheimer against All Defendants with Jury Demand. No summons requested. Fee Required - Fee Not Paid. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of County - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (LeJune, Dana) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
| NOTICE of Error directed to: Dana A. LeJune re #1 Complaint,,. Parties listed on the initiating document were omitted. The filing attorney must use the docket event Addition of Parties to correct the error. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (SKra) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by David Oppenheimer to Copyright Office (LeJune, Dana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by David Oppenheimer against All Defendants with Jury Demand. No summons requested. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7732444 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of County - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - The Original Work, #3 Exhibit 2 - Copyright Registration, #4 Exhibit 3 - Infringement, #5 Exhibit 4 - Infringement #2) (LeJune, Dana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
