Frost et al v. Family Health
| Eschar Hartong, Janice Baker and Anita Frost |
| Family Health |
| 2:2020cv11202 |
| May 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Certify Class and Court-Authorized Notice to Potential Opt-In Plaintiffs Pursuant to 29 USC by Janice Baker, Anita Frost, Eschar Hartong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Notice and Consent, #2 Exhibit B - Frost Declaration, #3 Exhibit C - Baker Declaration, #4 Exhibit D - Hartong Declaration, #5 Exhibit E - Family Health Letter) (Bailey, Elaina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND filed by Anita Frost, Eschar Hartong, Janice Baker against Family Health with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7803507 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join - Anita Frost, #2 Exhibit B - Consent to Join - Janice Baker, #3 Exhibit C - Consent to Join - Eschar Hartong, #4 Exhibit D - Family Health 12.31.19) (Bailey, Elaina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
