Pillow v. Henry et al
Lawrence Pillow |
JANE/JOHN DOE, Joshua Henry, LT. Sanchez and City of Detroit |
2:2020cv11360 |
May 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
George Caram Steeh |
Civil Rights: Other |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses AND RELIANCE ON JURY DEMAND, ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses AND RELIANCE ON JURY DEMAND by LT. Sanchez. (Jamison, Eric) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. LT. Sanchez served on 7/3/2020, answer due 7/24/2020. (Robinson, David) |
Filing 14 ORDER Denying Defendant Henry's #6 Motion to Dismiss as Moot. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and RELIANCE ON JURY DEMAND by Joshua Henry. (Jamison, Eric) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE to #6 MOTION Defendant Henry's Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of an Answer and Brief in Opposition filed by All Plaintiffs. (Robinson, David) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Issued for *City of Detroit, Joshua Henry, LT. Sanchez* (TTho) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by City of Detroit against All Defendants. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Robinson, David) Modified on 6/30/2020 (TTho). [FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT] |
Filing 9 [FIRST}AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Robinson, David) Modified on 6/30/2020 (TTho). |
REQUEST for SUMMONS for LT. Sanchez. (Robinson, David) |
REQUEST for SUMMONS for All Defendants. (Robinson, David) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: Plaintiff must file a response to Defendant's Request to convert Motion to Dismiss into a Motion for Summary Judgment by July 2, 2020 re #6 MOTION Defendant Henry's Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of an Answer filed by Joshua Henry. Entered by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued for *JANE/JOHN DOE* (LGra) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued for *Joshua Henry* (LGra) |
Filing 6 MOTION Defendant Henry's Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of an Answer by Joshua Henry. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E) (Jamison, Eric) |
REQUEST for SUMMONS for All Defendants. (Robinson, David) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon McNeal on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (McNeal, Brandon) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Robinson on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Robinson, David) |
Filing 3 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Defendants' time to file and serve a response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Response due by 6/18/2020. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas E. Kuhn on behalf of Lawrence Pillow. (Kuhn, Thomas) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Joshua Henry from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 20-005369-NO. Receipt No: BMIEDC-7829512 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit C) (Jamison, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.