Reed v. Correct Care Solutions
Arelious Reed |
Correct Care Solutions |
2:2020cv11523 |
June 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Denise Page Hood |
Anthony P Patti |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 REPLY to Response re #8 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Complaint As Demurrer, #7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed by Correct Care Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Williams v. Mich. Dep_t of Corr.) (Scarber, Devlin) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF HEARING BY VIDEO CONFERENCE on #7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Motion Hearing set for 9/2/2020 02:30 PM before District Judge Denise Page Hood |Zoom Webinar Information: https://zoom.us/j/99466599715?pwd=UWJFRDR3dG1TWE9uNVAwR3NycU94UT09 Passcode: 388122 Or iPhone one-tap : US: +13126266799,,99466599715#,,,,,,0#,,388122# or +13017158592,,99466599715#,,,,,,0#,,388122#| (LSau) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Complaint As Demurrer by Arelious Reed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 and 2) (Reed, Arelious) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by Correct Care Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A- Vandiver v Correctional Medical Services, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99312, *21 (W.D. Mich. July 2, 2010), #3 Exhibit B- Diemond v. Mich. Dep't of Corr., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35169, *19 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 5, 2018), #4 Exhibit C- Stafford v. Vaughn, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1609, at *1 (6th Cir. Feb. 2, 1999), #5 Exhibit D- Lewis v. Fayette Cty. Detention Ctr., 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8810, at *5-6 (6th Cir. Apr. 28, 2000), #6 Exhibit E- Kensu v. Rapelje, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120423 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 10, 2015)) (Scarber, Devlin) |
Filing 6 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Correct Care Solutions (Scarber, Devlin) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Devlin K. Scarber appearing on behalf of Correct Care Solutions (Scarber, Devlin) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Ronald W. Chapman appearing on behalf of Correct Care Solutions (Chapman, Ronald) |
FILING FEE Received in the amount of 400.00 by Arelious Reed - Receipt No. DET130496 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (BHan) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Correct Care Solutions* (SOso) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Arelious Reed against Correct Care Solutions (SOso) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Reed v. Correct Care Solutions | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Arelious Reed | |
Represented By: | Arelious Reed |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions | |
Represented By: | Ronald W. Chapman |
Represented By: | Devlin K. Scarber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.