Pursuit Detroit, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company v. Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
| Pursuit Detroit, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company |
| ` Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation |
| 2:2020cv11613 |
| June 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Arthur J Tarnow |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by ` Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation for ` Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Harrington, Robin) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and reliance upon jury demand by ` Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Harrington, Robin) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Defendants. (Harrell, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robin E. Harrington on behalf of ` Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Harrington, Robin) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Mark L. Dolin appearing on behalf of ` Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (Dolin, Mark) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by All Plaintiffs (Harrell, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *` Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation* (DWor) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7875169 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Harrell, Michelle) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pursuit Detroit, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company v. Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pursuit Detroit, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | Michelle C. Harrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ` Velofix Holdings USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Mark L. Dolin |
| Represented By: | Robin E. Harrington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
