Brody v. CultureSource et al
Plaintiff: Hillary Brody
Defendant: William Omari Rush, CoStaff H.R. Services, Inc. and CultureSource
Case Number: 2:2020cv11663
Filed: June 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: George Caram Steeh
Referring Judge: R Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATED ORDER Staying Discovery. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Vacating Referral of #14 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by CoStaff H.R. Services, Inc., William Omari Rush, CultureSource to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. The case remains referred for all other nondispositive pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
August 14, 2020 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Scheduling Conference on 8/31/2020 is Adjourned Without Date pending resolution of #14 Motion to Compel Arbitration/Dismiss Case. (BSau)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Referring Pretrial Matters Excluding Dispositive Motions to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen Including #14 Motion to Compel. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
August 13, 2020 Filing 14 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1., #3 Exhibit 2., #4 Exhibit 3.) (Norris, Megan)
July 23, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 8/31/2020 at 3:00 PM before District Judge George Caram Steeh. *Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the conference call to 313-234-5175* ***JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN DUE BY 8/24/2020*** (BSau)
July 22, 2020 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by CoStaff H.R. Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1) (Norris, Megan)
July 22, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Nhan Thi Ngoc Ho on behalf of CoStaff H.R. Services, Inc.. (Ho, Nhan)
July 22, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan P. Norris on behalf of CoStaff H.R. Services, Inc.. (Norris, Megan)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER Granting #9 Emergency MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to Complaint filed by William Omari Rush, CultureSource. Entered by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
July 17, 2020 Filing 9 Emergency MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to Complaint by CultureSource, William Omari Rush. (Ho, Nhan)
July 17, 2020 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses (Corrected) by CultureSource, William Omari Rush. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Norris, Megan)
July 17, 2020 Filing 7 [STRICKEN] ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by CultureSource, William Omari Rush. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Norris, Megan) Modified on 7/20/2020 (BSau).
July 17, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nhan Thi Ngoc Ho on behalf of All Defendants. (Ho, Nhan)
July 17, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan P. Norris on behalf of CoStaff H.R. Services, Inc., CultureSource, William Omari Rush. (Norris, Megan)
June 24, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *William Omari Rush* (DWor)
June 24, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *CultureSource* (DWor)
June 24, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *CoStaff H.R. Services, Inc.* (DWor)
June 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Hillary Brody against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7883867 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Weininger, Daniel)
June 24, 2020 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brody v. CultureSource et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hillary Brody
Represented By: Daniel W. Weininger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Omari Rush
Represented By: Megan P. Norris
Represented By: Nhan Thi Ngoc Ho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CoStaff H.R. Services, Inc.
Represented By: Megan P. Norris
Represented By: Nhan Thi Ngoc Ho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CultureSource
Represented By: Megan P. Norris
Represented By: Nhan Thi Ngoc Ho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?