Lupis v. General Motors LLC
Alfred Lupis |
General Motors LLC |
2:2020cv11972 |
July 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Bernard A Friedman |
Mark A Goldsmith |
R Steven Whalen |
Contract Product Liability |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Notice to Parties Regarding Consolidated Case: Order of consolidation entered on *09/02/20*. Designated lead case number is *20-11057*. (DPer) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION AND ORDER consolidating cases. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (DPer) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by General Motors LLC OF SUBMISSION OF STIPULATED ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 42(A) AND E.D. MICH. L.R. 42.1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Glassman, Jacqueline) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jacqueline S. Glassman appearing on behalf of General Motors LLC (Glassman, Jacqueline) |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith and Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen to District Judge Bernard A. Friedman and Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (SSch) |
Filing 4 Docket Sheet from Massachusetts; Case Number 1:19-cv-11582. |
TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: This case has been transferred from the District of Massachusetts. Pending motions must be refiled on this court's docket by the filing party. Attorneys not admitted to practice in this court must complete the attorney admissions application and be admitted before appearing on this court's docket. All previously filed documents can be accessed on the originating court's docket using PACER. (VLun) |
Filing 3 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ORDER re 29 Stipulation...The Court having reviewed the preceding stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is SO ORDERED that this case shall be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.(Beatty, Barbara) [Transferred from mad on 7/23/2020.] |
Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST) against General Motors LLC, filed by Alfred Lupis.(Zohdy, Tarek) [Transferred from mad on 7/23/2020.] |
Filing 1 TRANSFERREDCOMPLAINT against General Motors LLC Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7790247 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Alfred Lupis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Local Category Form)(Duggan, Benjamin) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/22/2019 to correct PDF formatting) (Kinsella, Devan). [Transferred from Massachusetts; Case Number 1:19-cv-11582.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lupis v. General Motors LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alfred Lupis | |
Represented By: | Mark A. Ozzello |
Represented By: | Tarek H. Zohdy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: General Motors LLC | |
Represented By: | Livia Kiser |
Represented By: | Jacqueline S. Glassman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.