LinTech Global, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration
LinTech Global, Inc. |
Federal Aviation Administration |
2:2020cv12062 |
July 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Bernard A Friedman |
Linda V Parker |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 10/15/2020 at 11:30 AM before District Judge Linda V. Parker (RLou) |
RESET CONFERENCE ***TIME CHANGE ONLY***: TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference RESET for 10/15/2020 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Linda V. Parker (RLou) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Federal Aviation Administration. (Toomey, Zak) |
Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Bernard A. Friedman to District Judge Linda V. Parker. (NAhm) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (DWor) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Federal Aviation Administration* (DWor) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark William Steiner on behalf of LinTech Global, Inc.. (Steiner, Mark) |
Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by LinTech Global, Inc. (Boutrous, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by LinTech Global, Inc. against Federal Aviation Administration. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7961280 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): USDC Eastern District of Michigan, 19-cv-11600, Judge Linda V. Parker] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1. Subpoena to FAA, #3 Exhibit 2. FAA letter dated 2/28/20, #4 Exhibit 3. FAA letter dated 3/19/20, #5 Exhibit 4. Letter to FAA dated 4/7/20, #6 Exhibit 5. FAA letter dated 4/24/20, #7 Exhibit 6. Emails correspondence with the FAA, #8 Exhibit 7. Letter from FAA dated 5/13/20, #9 Exhibit 8. Letter from FAA dated 7/20/20, #10 Exhibit 9. Deposition subpoenas) (Boutrous, James) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LinTech Global, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Federal Aviation Administration | |
Represented By: | Zak Toomey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LinTech Global, Inc. | |
Represented By: | James J. Boutrous, II |
Represented By: | Mark William Steiner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.