Williams v. Rurka
Kenneth Karl Williams |
Noah Nagy, Jeremy Bush, Russell Rurka, Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington |
2:2020cv12349 |
August 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Stephen J Murphy |
R Steven Whalen |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Limited Appearance by Alicia M. Lane on behalf of Russell Rurka for the purposes of the Pro Se Prisoner Early Mediation Program. (Lane, Alicia) |
Filing 4 ORDER STAYING CASE and referral to the Pro Se Prisoner Early Mediation Program. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPer) |
Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER granting #2 Application to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs and partially dismissing complaint. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPer) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #3 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Kenneth Karl Williams, 234758, G. ROBERT COTTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 3500 N. ELM ROAD, JACKSON, MI 49201. (DPar) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Kenneth Karl Williams. (DAll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kenneth Karl Williams against Jeremy Bush, Michigan Department of Corrections, Noah Nagy, Russell Rurka, Heidi Washington (DAll) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/9/2020: #1 COVERSHEET) (DAll). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.