KELMENDI et al v. HOGAN
| JOHN KELMENDI and TOM DJONOVIC |
| T. HOGAN |
| 2:2020cv12354 |
| August 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Denise Page Hood |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 11/23/2020 09:30 AM before District Judge Denise Page Hood (Joint Rule 26f Report due 11/16/20) (LSau)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by All Defendants. (Badalamenti, Raechel)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth P. Roberts on behalf of All Defendants. (Roberts, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Raechel M. Badalamenti appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Badalamenti, Raechel)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Defendants. (Lovell, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for *T. HOGAN* (LGra)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8015238 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: MACOMB - County Where Action Arose: MACOMB - County of 1st Defendant: MACOMB. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Lovell, Stephen)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
