Woodberry
| Mark H. Shapiro |
| Yumi Yoo Woodberry and LaJeff Lee Percy Woodberry |
| 2:2020cv12622 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| George Caram Steeh |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Designated Bankruptcy Record (VLun) |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE of Receipt of Complete Record on Appeal (VLun) |
Filing 5
ORDER Requiring Response to #4 Motion to Dismiss. Response due by 11/13/2020, Reply due by 12/1/2020. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading mailed to LaJeff Lee Percy Woodberry at 18283 Muirland, Detroit, MI 48221, and Yumi Yoo Woodberry at 18283 Muirland, Detroit, MI 48221. (BSau) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Mark H. Shapiro. (Clark, Tracy) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to the Notice to Bankruptcy Appeal. Appeal fee paid. (VLun) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Receipt of Bankruptcy Appeal (VLun) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT filed by LaJeff Lee Percy Woodberry, Yumi Yoo Woodberry, Bankruptcy Court case number 18-46856. Filing fee is not paid. (VLun) |
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #2 Notice of Receipt of Bankruptcy Documents on LaJeff Lee Percy Woodberry and Yumi Yoo Woodberry at 18283 Muirland, Detroit, MI 48221. (VLun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
