Medina Portillo v. Wolf et al
| Detroit Field Office Rebecca Adducci, David H Wetmore, Michael J Klinger, Daniel Renaud, Kenneth Kuccinelli, James McHenry, Tony H Pham, WILLIAM P BARR and Sec. DHS Chad F. Wolf |
| Michael Medina Portillo |
| 2:2020cv12730 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Stephen J Murphy |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs on Appeal by Michael Medina Portillo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Liss, Maris) |
Filing 16
ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals - Sixth Circuit re #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Medina Portillo [Appeal Case Number 20-2031/20-4115] (TTho)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals - Sixth Circuit re #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Medina Portillo [Appeal Case Number 20-2031] (TTho)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals - Sixth Circuit re #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Medina Portillo [Appeal Case Number 20-2031] (TTho)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals - Sixth Circuit re #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Medina Portillo [Appeal Case Number 20-2031] (SKra)
|
| Filing 12 Certificate of Service re #11 Notice of Appeal. (ATee) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Michael Medina Portillo re #10 Order Dismissing Case. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. (Liss, Maris) |
|
Filing 10
OPINION and ORDER DISMISSING #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Denying #7 Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)
|
| Filing 9 REPLY to #8 Response to Petition/Request/Application in opposition to first amended emergency petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for TRO by Michael Medina Portillo. (Liss, Maris) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to First Amended Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - ICE Declaration) (Parling, Brittany) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Michael Medina Portillo. (Liss, Maris) |
|
Filing 6
Second Case Management ORDER re #5 Amended Petition, (Response due by 10/16/2020). Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Deportation, by Michael Medina Portillo (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit) (Liss, Maris) |
|
Filing 4
Case Management ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Deportation, (Response due by 10/15/2020). Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)
|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Maris J. Liss appearing on behalf of Michael Medina Portillo (Liss, Maris) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Brittany D. Parling on behalf of All Defendants. (Parling, Brittany) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Regarding Deportation filed by Michael Medina Portillo against All Defendants, Receipt No: AMIEDC-8094671 - Fee: 5 dollars. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit) (Liss, Maris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
