Robinson v. Alorica Inc.
Thomas Robinson |
Alorica Inc. |
2:2020cv12762 |
October 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Sean F Cox |
Anthony P Patti |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by All Defendants. (Rubin, Allan) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Counts I, II, and V of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Unpublished Cases) (Rubin, Allan) |
Filing 8 ORDER Denying #3 Motion to Dismiss as Moot. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Thomas Robinson against All Defendants. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Severance Pay Plan, #3 Exhibit B - 09/17/2019 - Email to Thomas Robinson, #4 Exhibit C - Retention Agreement, #5 Exhibit D - 12/31/2019 Letter to Thomas Robinson, #6 Exhibit E - Severance and General Release Agreement, #7 Exhibit F - 2020 Summary of Termination of Benefits) (Beer, Brendon) |
Filing 6 ORDER re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Counts I and II of Plaintiff's Complaint Under Fed R Civ P 12(b)(6) filed by Alorica Inc. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Alorica Inc. (Rubin, Allan) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Alorica Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A September 2019 email from supervisor to Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit B - RBA, #3 Exhibit C - Severance Policy) (Rubin, Allan) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Counts I and II of Plaintiff's Complaint Under Fed R Civ P 12(b)(6) by Alorica Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - September 2019 email from supervisor to Plaintiff, #3 Exhibit 3 - RBA, #4 Exhibit 4 - Severance Policy, #5 Exhibit 5 - Unpublished Cases) (Rubin, Allan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel C. Waslawski on behalf of Alorica Inc.. (Waslawski, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Alorica Inc. from Jackson County Circuit Court, case number 20-3278-CK. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8101103 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration in Support of Notice of Removal) (Rubin, Allan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Robinson v. Alorica Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Alorica Inc. | |
Represented By: | Allan S. Rubin |
Represented By: | Daniel C. Waslawski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Thomas Robinson | |
Represented By: | Brendon R Beer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.