Tranchmontagne v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
| Deanna Tranchmontagne |
| United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Gary Heidel and Michigan State Housing Development Authority |
| 2:2020cv12842 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Paul D Borman |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO COMPLETE AND PRESENT DOCUMENTS TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Order on Deanna Tranchmontagne at15841 Dort Street, Roseville, MI 48066 (DTof) |
| Filing 5 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Deanna Tranchmontagne at 15841 Dort Street, Roseville, MI 48066 (DTof) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Deanna Tranchmontagne. (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Deanna Tranchmontagne against defendants (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
