Dinh v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Acting Secretary of Chad Wolf, Detroit Field Office Michael J Klinger, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Official Performing Ken Cuccinelli, Director Director, Nebraska Service center (USCIS) and Director, Nebraska Service Center |
| Ngoc Thi Bich Dinh |
| 3:2020cv13097 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney on behalf of All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Summons/Return of Service) (Birach, Robert) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (TTho) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (TTho) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Ngoc Thi Bich Dinh against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8177970 - Fee: 400 dollars. County of 1st Plaintiff: Livingston - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Exhibits A-E) (Birach, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
