Crockett v. General Motors Company
Angela Crockett and Angela Crockett [E-filer] |
General Motors Company |
2:2020cv13207 |
December 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Paul D Borman |
Curtis Ivy |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT from U.S. Marshal Service of Receipt of Service of Process Documents. (DPer) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued for *General Motors Company* (DPer) |
Pro Se E-filing Access Given to Angela Crockett [E-filer]. (SKra) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and granting request for service by the U.S. Marshal. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Angela Crockett at 19680 Roslyn Road Detroit, MI 48221 (DTof) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 3 ORDER of Recusal and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III to District Judge Paul D. Borman. (NAhm) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Angela Crockett. (ATee) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Angela Crockett against General Motors Company (Attachments: #1 Right To Sue Letter) (ATee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.