Tobias v. Terex USA, Inc. et al
Len Tobias |
Power Screen USA, LLC and Terex USA, Inc. |
2:2020cv13333 |
December 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Sean F Cox |
R Steven Whalen |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses Defendants' Answer and Affirmative Defenses by All Defendants. (Paxton, Thomas) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendants to Respond re #1 Complaint. (Responsive Pleading due by 2/11/2021) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas R. Paxton on behalf of All Defendants. (Paxton, Thomas) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Power Screen USA, LLC served on 12/31/2020, answer due 1/21/2021. (Nyeholt, Collin) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Terex USA, Inc.* (LGra) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Power Screen USA, LLC* (LGra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Len Tobias against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8230099 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Shiawassee - County Where Action Arose: Shiawassee - County of 1st Defendant: Shiawassee. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit - Verification of Complaint) (Nyeholt, Collin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.