Petrou v. Ann Arbor, City of et al
| Myria Petrou |
| Tarick Seifeddine, Ann Arbor, City of, Paul Cronin and Aine Kelly |
| 2:2021cv10110 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Sean F Cox |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Arthur J Tarnow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 EXHIBITS by Myria Petrou (DPer) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (DPer) |
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow and Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr to District Judge Sean F. Cox and Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (NAhm)
|
| Filing 6 EXHIBITS by Myria Petrou (DPer) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL AND REASSIGNING CASE from Magistrate Judge David R. Grand to Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (NAhm)
|
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT with jury demand filed by Myria Petrou against defendants. (DPer) |
| FILING FEE Received in the amount of 402 by Myria Petrou - Receipt No. DET133842 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (RBog) |
| Deficiency directed to Myria Petrou: Initiating document filed without any form of payment or Application for In Forma Pauperis. (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Myria Petrou against defendants (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
