Heard v. Strange et al
| 2:2021cv10237 |
| February 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
AMENDED OPINION and ORDER Accepting and Adopting 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Granting 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION and ORDER Accepting and Adopting 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Granting 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Overruling 37 Objections to 33 Report and Recommendation - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Adopting 33 Report and Recommendation and Denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion for Reconsideration - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds (LBar)
|
|
Filing
7
JUDGMENT - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heard v. Strange et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
