Levanduski v. Chapman
| Matthew Jack Levanduski |
| Willis Chapman |
| 2:2021cv10571 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David M Lawson |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to #3 MOTION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus , Brief in Support, with Certificate of Service filed by Willis Chapman. (Shimkus, Scott)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading, on Matthew Jack Levanduski 381668, THUMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 3225 JOHN CONLEY DRIVE, LAPEER, MI 48446. (SPin)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Requiring Response to #3 Motion for compassionate release. Attached motion has been electronically served on the Michigan Attorney General and the Michigan Department of Corrections. Response due by 5/1/2021 Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Motion for Compassionate Release) (DPer)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Matthew Jack Levanduski381668, THUMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 3225 JOHN CONLEY DRIVE, LAPEER, MI 48446. (SPin)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attached Petition has been electronically served on the Michigan Attorney General and the Michigan Department of Corrections. Response due by 9/22/2021 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition) (TTho)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading, on Matthew Jack Levanduski381668 THUMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 3225 JOHN CONLEY DRIVE LAPEER, MI 48446 (TTho)
|
|
FILING FEE Received in the amount of $5.00 by Matthew Jack Levanduski - Receipt No. 134640 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (DPer)
|
|
Filing 3
EX-PARTE MOTION to file a Habeas Corpus Petition with more than 20 pages by Matthew Jack Levanduski. (DAll)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Matthew Jack Levanduski. (DAll)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Matthew Jack Levanduski against Willis Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation, #2 Coversheet) (DAll)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Levanduski v. Chapman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Matthew Jack Levanduski | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Willis Chapman | |
| Represented By: | Scott Robert Shimkus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
