Tillman v. Universal Fidelity, LP et al
Plaintiff: Paula Tillman
Defendant: CKS Prime Investments, LLC and Universal Fidelity, LP
Case Number: 2:2021cv10658
Filed: March 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Gershwin A Drain
Referring Judge: Elizabeth A Stafford
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE by Paula Tillman of Settlement (Volheim, Nathan)
April 26, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Gamboa on behalf of CKS Prime Investments, LLC. (Gamboa, Paul)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER Granting #7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, filed by Universal Fidelity, LP. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)
April 20, 2021 Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Universal Fidelity, LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Adler, Nathan)
April 1, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Universal Fidelity, LP served on 3/30/2021, answer due 4/20/2021. (Volheim, Nathan)
March 29, 2021 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. CKS Prime Investments, LLC waiver sent on 3/28/2021, answer due 5/27/2021. (Volheim, Nathan)
March 25, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Universal Fidelity, LP* (NAhm)
March 25, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *CKS Prime Investments, LLC* (NAhm)
March 25, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan C. Volheim on behalf of Paula Tillman. (Volheim, Nathan)
March 25, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Paula Tillman against CKS Prime Investments, LLC, Universal Fidelity, LP with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8401428 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland County - County Where Action Arose: Oakland County - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Volheim, Nathan)
March 25, 2021 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tillman v. Universal Fidelity, LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CKS Prime Investments, LLC
Represented By: Paul Gamboa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Universal Fidelity, LP
Represented By: Nathan Daniel Adler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paula Tillman
Represented By: Nathan C. Volheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?