CARTER v. SHEARER et al
CHARVELLE CARTER |
OFFICER JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, OFFICER SHEARER and LOUIS VUTTION NORTH AMERICA, INC |
2:2021cv10856 |
April 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Terrence G Berg |
Curtis Ivy |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin S. Ernst on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Ernst, Kevin) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time to Respond re #13 MOTION to Dismiss under 12(b)(6) filed by OFFICER JOHN DOE, OFFICER SHEARER. Response due by 6/28/2021 Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by OFFICER SHEARER. (MacMillan, Nicole) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss under 12(b)(6) by OFFICER JOHN DOE, OFFICER SHEARER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Bloch v. Bloch) (MacMillan, Nicole) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time to Respond re #1 Complaint. Response due by 6/16/2021 Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Ahmad A. Chehab on behalf of LOUIS VUTTION NORTH AMERICA, INC. (Chehab, Ahmad) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle P. Crockett on behalf of LOUIS VUTTION NORTH AMERICA, INC. (Crockett, Michelle) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. LOUIS VUTTION NORTH AMERICA, INC served on 4/26/2021, answer due 5/17/2021. (Lovell, Stephen) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time for Defendant Troy Police Officer Shearer to Respond re #1 Complaint. Response due by 5/24/2021 Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STRIKING #6 Stipulation filed by OFFICER SHEARER, GRANTING #4 MOTION for Leave to File Early Subpoenas filed by CHARVELLE CARTER. Parties must submit stipulation and proposed order via the proposed orders link in CM/ECF. See, R11 of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures for the EDMI, available as an Appendix to this District's Local Rules. Issued by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Lori G. Bluhm appearing on behalf of OFFICER SHEARER (Bluhm, Lori) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint,, extension of time for def to file first responsive pleading by OFFICER SHEARER (MacMillan, Nicole) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Nicole Francis MacMillan appearing on behalf of OFFICER SHEARER (MacMillan, Nicole) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File Early Subpoenas by CHARVELLE CARTER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Subpoenas) (Lovell, Stephen) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. OFFICER SHEARER served on 4/16/2021, answer due 5/7/2021. (Lovell, Stephen) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *JANE DOE, OFFICER JOHN DOE, LOUIS VUTTION NORTH AMERICA, INC, OFFICER SHEARER* (TTho) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by CHARVELLE CARTER against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8429259 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: OAKLAND - County Where Action Arose: OAKLAND - County of 1st Defendant: OAKLAND. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Lovell, Stephen) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TTho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.