Houston v. Steward
Michon Houston |
Darrell Stweard and Darrell Steward |
2:2021cv10861 |
April 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Kimberly G Altman |
Sean F Cox |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Kantarek on behalf of Michon Houston. (Kantarek, Kyle) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer Scot Hughes on behalf of Michon Houston. (Hughes, Spencer) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER Waiving Local Counsel Requirement. [Motion filed in 08-10963] Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 3 ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attached Petition has been electronically served on the Michigan Attorney General and the Michigan Department of Corrections. Response due by 11/1/2021 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition) (TTho) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #3 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading, on Michon Houston (TTho) |
Filing 2 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis in Flint to District Judge Sean F. Cox in Detroit. (SSch) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michon Houston against Darrell Stweard, Receipt No: AMIEDC-8429594 - Fee: $ 5. [Second Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Originally filed in 08-10963] (SSch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.