Macovei v. USCIS Detroit District Director et al
| Robert Paul Macovei |
| USCIS Detroit and Director USCIS Detroit District Director |
| 2:2021cv11214 |
| May 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Naturalization Application |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (LGra) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *USCIS Detroit, USCIS Detroit District Director* (LGra) |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF CITIZENSHIP DENIAL filed by Robert Paul Macovei against USCIS Detroit, USCIS Detroit District Director. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8476172 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USCIS Decision) (Daman, Julian) |
| Filing 1 [WRONG EVENT USED - FILED IN ERROR] PETITION FOR REVIEW OF CITIZENSHIP DENIAL by Robert Paul Macovei. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USCIS Decision) (Daman, Julian) Modified on 5/25/2021 (SSch). [Attorney will re-file using initiating event] Modified on 5/25/2021 (LGra). Modified on 5/25/2021 (LGra). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
