Stone v. Concord Consumer Co-Op et al
Le'Netta Stone |
Marcus Mgmt., Concord Consumer Co-Op and U.S.P.S.D.C. [Trenton] |
2:2021cv11311 |
June 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Sean F Cox |
Anthony P Patti |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Granting #8 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, by Le'Netta Stone and SUMMARILY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #9 Order on Le'Netta Stone at 22846 Nadyne, Brownstown Twp., MI 48183 (JMcC) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, by Le'Netta Stone. (RLou) |
Filing 7 EXHIBITS in support of #1 Complaint by Le'Netta Stone (DPer) |
Filing 6 INDEX of Exhibits With Additional Exhibits re #1 Complaint, #5 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit by Le'Netta Stone. (RLou) |
Filing 5 ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS re #1 Complaint by Le'Netta Stone (RLou) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 3 EXHIBIT re #1 Complaint, by Le'Netta Stone (RLou) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Le'Netta Stone against defendants (DPer) |
Deficiency directed to Le'Netta Stone : Initiating document filed without any form of payment or Application for In Forma Pauperis. (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.