Lambert v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
| Matthew Lambert |
| CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Omnicare, Inc. and Omnicare a CVSHealth Company |
| 2:2021cv11970 |
| August 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Laurie J Michelson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STIPULATED ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION AND STAYING CASE. Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EPar)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Omnicare, Inc.* (DPer) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *CVS Pharmacy, Inc.* (DPer) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Raymond J. Sterling on behalf of Matthew Lambert. (Sterling, Raymond) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand filed by Matthew Lambert against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8589859 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: out of state - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Baker, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
