DJR Properties LLC v. Hazel Park, City of
DJR Properties LLC |
Hazel Park, City of |
2:2021cv12039 |
September 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Arthur J Tarnow |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY VIDEO CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 11/10/2021 02:00 PM before District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. Counsel will receive Zoom invitation by email. (MLan) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Hazel Park, City of. (Young, Carlito) |
Filing 10 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Response to #5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Response due by 10/19/2021. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Andrea Marie Pike appearing on behalf of Hazel Park, City of (Pike, Andrea) |
Filing 8 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Response to #1 Complaint. Response due by 10/8/2021. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Debani T. Gordon appearing on behalf of Hazel Park, City of (Gordon, Debani) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Carlito H. Young appearing on behalf of Hazel Park, City of (Young, Carlito) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by DJR Properties LLC. (Burdett, Howard) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Hazel Park, City of served on 9/3/2021, answer due 9/24/2021. (Burdett, Howard) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Howard W. Burdett, Jr on behalf of DJR Properties LLC. (Burdett, Howard) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Hazel Park, City of* (SKra) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by DJR Properties LLC against Hazel Park, City of. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8601877 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Steen, Kory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DJR Properties LLC v. Hazel Park, City of | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DJR Properties LLC | |
Represented By: | Kory Mark Steen |
Represented By: | Howard W. Burdett, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hazel Park, City of | |
Represented By: | Andrea Marie Pike |
Represented By: | Carlito H. Young |
Represented By: | Debani T. Gordon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.