Bethea v. General Motors Company GM Tech Center et al
| Robert Eugene Bethea |
| General Motors Company GM Tech Center, United Autoworkers Local #160 and Aramark Services |
| 2:2021cv12432 |
| October 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Laurie J Michelson |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| FILING FEE Received in the amount of 402.00 by Robert Eugene Bethea - Receipt No. DET137785 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (BHan) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TTho) |
| Filing 3 Pro Se E-filer Electronic Account Renewal Form submitted by Robert Eugene Bethea (pending approval). (TTho) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Robert Eugene Bethea against All Defendants (TTho) |
| Deficiency directed to Robert Eugene Bethea: Initiating document filed without any form of payment or Application for In Forma Pauperis. (TTho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
