Pacific-Ocean Auto Parts Company v. General Motors Company
Plaintiff: A California Corporation d/b/a PAPCO Pacific-Ocean Auto Parts Company
Defendant: A Delaware Company General Motors Company
Case Number: 2:2021cv12516
Filed: October 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly G Altman
Referring Judge: George Caram Steeh
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATED ORDER Staying Action and Extending GM's Deadline to Respond to Complaint. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Theresa A. Munaco appearing on behalf of A Delaware Company General Motors Company (Munaco, Theresa)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by A Delaware Company General Motors Company (Baucus, Laura)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Baucus on behalf of A Delaware Company General Motors Company. (Baucus, Laura)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by All Plaintiffs (Orlandoni, Donald)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Quendale George Simmons on behalf of A California Corporation d/b/a PAPCO Pacific-Ocean Auto Parts Company. (Simmons, Quendale)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by A California Corporation d/b/a PAPCO Pacific-Ocean Auto Parts Company (Orlandoni, Donald)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *A Delaware Company General Motors Company* (SKra)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against A Delaware Company General Motors Company. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8667789 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Santa Clara - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Orlandoni, Donald)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pacific-Ocean Auto Parts Company v. General Motors Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A California Corporation d/b/a PAPCO Pacific-Ocean Auto Parts Company
Represented By: Donald V. Orlandoni
Represented By: Quendale George Simmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A Delaware Company General Motors Company
Represented By: Laura Baucus
Represented By: Theresa A. Munaco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?