United States of America v. Parks et al
| United States of America |
| Ronald G. Parks and Madeline M. Parks |
| 2:2021cv12676 |
| November 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Paul D Borman |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Madeline M. Parks waiver sent on 12/7/2021, answer due 2/7/2022. (Galisewski, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Ronald G. Parks(as Trustee for the Ronald G. Parks Revocable Living Trust dated April 13, 2006) waiver sent on 12/7/2021, answer due 2/7/2022; Ronald G. Parks(as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Merle L. Parks) waiver sent on 12/7/2021, answer due 2/7/2022; Ronald G. Parks(individually) waiver sent on 12/7/2021, answer due 2/7/2022. (Galisewski, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (TTho)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by United States of America against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. No Fee Required - US Government. County of 1st Plaintiff: USA - County Where Action Arose: St. Clair County - County of 1st Defendant: St. Clair County. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Galisewski, Ryan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
