Buchanan v. Hemingway
| Jesse Tyrone Buchanan |
| J. Hemingway and Jonathan Hemingway |
| 2:2021cv12934 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Victoria A Roberts |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attached Petition has been electronically served on the Office of the United States Attorney. Response due by 4/1/2022 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Habeas Petition) (TTho)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Amending Case Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (TTho)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Sean F. Cox and Magistrate Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey to District Judge Victoria A. Roberts and Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (SSch)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDMENT in support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Jesse Tyrone Buchanan (TTho) |
| Filing 2 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jesse Tyrone Buchanan against J. Hemingway, Receipt No: DET138681 - Fee: $ 5. (Attachments: #1 Cover sheet) (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
