All-Ways Care Services, Inc. v. Best Essential Services, Inc. et al
All-Ways Care Services, Inc. |
Best Essential Services, Inc., Best Support Services, Inc. and Malik El' Khatib |
2:2021cv12993 |
December 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Sean F Cox |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (MacKenzie, John) |
![]() |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued for *Malik El' Khatib* (LHos) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Best Support Services, Inc.* (LHos) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Best Essential Services, Inc.* (LHos) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by All Plaintiffs (MacKenzie, John) |
Filing 2 Ex Parte MOTION for Preliminary Injunction , Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A-H) (MacKenzie, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8732356 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Macomb. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (MacKenzie, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.