Moore v. AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shawn Moore
Defendant: AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc.
Petitioner: RevSpring
Case Number: 2:2021mc51207
Filed: September 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Nancy G Edmunds
Referring Judge: Elizabeth A Stafford
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting (ECF No.[12)] Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply re #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena by RevSpring. Receipt No: BMIEDC-8625721 - Fee: 49 dollars. Reply due by 11/22/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (MarW)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford: #12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
November 17, 2021 Filing 12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena by RevSpring. Receipt No: BMIEDC-8625721 - Fee: 49 dollars by RevSpring. (Green, Jennifer)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena by RevSpring. Response due by 11/17/2021; Reply, if any due by 11/24/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (MarW)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford: #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
November 10, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena by RevSpring. Receipt No: BMIEDC-8625721 - Fee: 49 dollars Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Plaintiff Rule 45 Subpoena by RevSpring. (Green, Jennifer)
November 3, 2021 Filing 9 RESPONSE to #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena by RevSpring. Receipt No: BMIEDC-8625721 - Fee: 49 dollars filed by Shawn Moore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Radbil Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - Defendant's opposition to motion for class certification, #3 Exhibit C - Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Transcript Excerpts, #4 Exhibit D - Confidentiality agreement) (Radbil, Aaron)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Non-Party RevSpring, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Plaintiff's Rule 45 Subpoena for Deposition and Subpoena Duces Tecum. (Response due by 11/3/2021). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (MarW)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
October 7, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena by RevSpring. Receipt No: BMIEDC-8625721 - Fee: 49 dollars by Shawn Moore. (Radbil, Aaron)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Non-Party Revspring, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Plaintiff's Rule 45 Subpoena for Deposition and Subpoena Duces Tecum. ( Response due by 10/13/2021). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (MarW)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford: #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
September 28, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena by RevSpring. Receipt No: BMIEDC-8625721 - Fee: 49 dollars by Shawn Moore. (Radbil, Aaron)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford: #1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
September 22, 2021 Filing 1 INITIATING MOTION Quash Subpoena by RevSpring. Receipt No: BMIEDC-8625721 - Fee: 49 dollars (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Subpoena, #3 Exhibit B - Harwood Declaration) (Green, Jennifer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Moore
Represented By: Aaron David Radbil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RevSpring
Represented By: Jennifer K. Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?