Norman v. Wahtola et al
Marville Norman |
Russell Wahtola, D. Laginess, G. Ray, Kari Patton, Malloy, Nagy, Rohrig and S. Harris |
2:2022cv10332 |
February 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Patricia T Morris |
Linda V Parker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Directing Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee in the amount of $0 and subsequent payments. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (SKra) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Marville Norman; with affidavit and prison account statement. (DPer) |
Deficiency corrected re #3 Order. (DPer) |
Filing 3 ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit filing fee. Correction due by 3/25/2022 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (SKra) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #3 Order to Correct Deficiency (Habeas and 1983 Complaints Only) on Marville Norman Pris. No. 132054 at 3225 JOHN CONLEY DRIVE, LAPEER, MI 48446. (SKra) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Mediation Program (SKra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marville Norman against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Coversheet) (SKra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.