Miller v. Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated
| Joel Miller |
| Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated and Fred Lavery Company |
| 2:2022cv10376 |
| February 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Paul D Borman |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Fact Discovery due by 10/28/2022; Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 1/25/2023 Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. *SOME DATES DIFFER FROM DISCOVERY PLAN* (Refer to image for additional dates) (DTof)
|
| Filing 11 Joint Rule 26 Report REPORT by Joel Miller (Romano, Mark) |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE:Scheduling Conference 04/15/2022 is Cancelled (DTof) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated (Upton, Lindsay) Modified on 3/11/2022 (SSch). [DOCUMENT TITLED "AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL"] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: DISCOVERY PLAN DUE 4/14/2022; Scheduling Conference set for 4/15/2022 04:00 PM before District Judge Paul D. Borman *READ ENTIRE NOTICE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION* (DTof) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER to Strike 4 Amended Document filed by Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER of DISQUALIFICATION and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Robert H. Cleland in Port Huron to District Judge Paul D. Borman in Detroit. (SSch)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Fred Lavery Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Statement of Disclosure) (Upton, Lindsay) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated. (Upton, Lindsay) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
| NOTICE of error directed to Lindsay M. Upton re #1 Notice of Removal. Parties listed on the initiating document were omitted. The filing attorney must use the docket event Addition of Parties to correct the error and add plaintiff Fred Lavery Company. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (DPer) |
| Addition of Parties to CM/ECF: Defendant Fred Lavery Company. Reason: The party was not added to CM/ECF when e-filing #1 Notice of Removal, 4 Amended Document, #3 Amended Document, #2 Statement of Disclosure of Corporate Affiliations, (Upton, Lindsay) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED #1 Notice of Removal, by Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet) (Upton, Lindsay) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Volkswagon AG, Corporate Parent Porsche AG for Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated. (Upton, Lindsay) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Porsche Cars North America, Incorporated from Circuit Court for the County of Oakland, case number 2022-192081-NZ. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8802100 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint) (Upton, Lindsay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
