Kwiotek et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
| Erwin Kwiotek and Carol Lynn Kwiotek |
| Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
| 2:2022cv10450 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Denise Page Hood |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER ENDORSING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Grant, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF IN PERSON HEARING on #2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 4/28/2022 03:00 PM before District Judge Denise Page Hood (LSau) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint by Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (Grant, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation from Circuit Court of Lapeer County, case number 22-055267-CH. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8815093 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Notice to State Court of Removal) (Grant, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
