Jolly v. Sniscak et al
| Maketa Jolly |
| Matthew Sniscak and Ashley Fox |
| 2:2022cv10534 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Sean F Cox |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to transfer from state to federal court federal question jurisdiction by Maketa Jolly. [No postmark and no signature date - receive stamped 04/28/22] (DPer) |
Filing 6
ORDER Denying #5 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (Filing Fee due by 5/5/2022) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Maketa Jolly at 101 East Baltimore Pike #127, Media, PA 19063 (JMcC) |
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Maketa Jolly. (NAhm) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT with jury demand filed by Maketa Jolly against Ashley Fox, Matthew Sniscak. (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Maketa Jolly against defendants (DPer) |
| Deficiency directed to Maketa Jolly: Initiating document filed without any form of payment or Application for In Forma Pauperis. (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
