Fraly v. Macomb Correctional Facility Medical Staff et al
| Buck A. Fraly |
| Macomb Correctional Facility Medical Staff, Jane Doe, JOHN DOE, Jane Doe #2 and Unknown McCliff |
| 2:2022cv10576 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Denise Page Hood |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Directing Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee in the amount of $21.98 and subsequent payments. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (TTho)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Buck A. Fraly, 461481, MACOMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 34625 26 MILE ROAD, NEW HAVEN, MI 48048 (TTho)
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Buck A. Fraly; with prison account statement. (DPer)
|
|
Deficiency corrected re #2 Order. (DPer)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit filing fee. Correction due by 4/20/2022 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (TTho)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Buck A. Fraly against All Defendants (SKra) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/18/2022: #1 Cover Sheet) (SKra).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
