Harris et al v Brickey
Ray Harris and Autumn Harris |
Carl Bruce Brickey and Beverly Brickey |
2:2022cv10604 |
March 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Kimberly G Altman |
Terrence G Berg |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Housing Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Beverly Brickey* (DAll) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Steinberg, Michael) |
REQUEST for SUMMONS for Beverly Brickey. (Steinberg, Michael) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Carl Bruce Brickey* (LHos) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ray Harris against Autumn Harris, Carl Bruce Brickey with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8841827 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Steinberg, Michael) Modified on 3/22/2022 (SKra).[COMPLAINT FILED BY RAY HARRIS AND AUTUMN HARRIS AGAINST CARL BRUCE BRICKEY] |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LHos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.