Johnson v. Serminski et al
| Darren Johnson |
| Serminski, Fried, Hill, Cobb and Richard D. Russell |
| 2:2022cv10660 |
| March 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for leave to file an amended complaint by Darren Johnson. (TTho) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend or Alter #6 Judgment by Darren Johnson. (LHos) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya) |
Filing 5
ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees and Costs and Summarily Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Judgment, #5 Order Dismissing Case on Darren Johnson Pris. No. 753595 at G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility, 3500 N. Elm Road, Jackson, MI 49201. (HRya) |
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Mediation Program (TTho) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Darren Johnson. (TTho) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Darren Johnson against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (TTho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
