Warwick v. Bryant et al
| Joanne Warwick |
| Antoine Bryant, Mike Duggan, Aaron Goodman, Richard Hosey, Kevin Lewand, John and/or Jane Does 1-25 and City of Detroit |
| 2:2022cv10896 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David M Lawson |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER VACATING REFERENCE, GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DENYING REQUEST FOR REFUND. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Order Dismissing Case on Joanne Warwick, 264 Smith, Detroit, MI 48202. (SPin) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to withdraw case without prejudice for health and other reasons and request for refund of filing fees by Joanne Warwick. (DPer) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Referring Pretrial Matters to Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #3 Order Referring Pretrial Matters to Magistrate Judge on Joanne Warwick, 264 Smith, Detroit, MI 48202. (SPin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH REQUEST FOR FRCP 65(b)(1) TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER filed by Joanne Warwick against Antoine Bryant, City of Detroit, John and/or Jane Does 1-25, Mike Duggan, Aaron Goodman, Richard Hosey, Kevin Lewand. Receipt No: DET140513 - Fee: $ 402. (LHos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
