EV TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. v. MICHIGAN INCOME AND PRINCIPAL-PROTECTED GROWTH FUND, LP et al
| EV TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. |
| MICHIGAN INCOME AND PRINCIPAL-PROTECTED GROWTH FUND, LP and ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY, LLC |
| 2:2022cv10950 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Linda V Parker |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. MICHIGAN INCOME AND PRINCIPAL-PROTECTED GROWTH FUND, LP waiver sent on 6/8/2022, answer due 8/8/2022. (Holtz, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 5
Trademark Report Sent To Washington (Holtz, Ethan)
|
|
NOTICE of Error directed to: Ethan R. Holtz. Form AO 120 is missing. The filing attorney must file the form found on www.uscourts.gov with the Court to correct the error. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (SSch)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued for *MICHIGAN INCOME AND PRINCIPAL-PROTECTED GROWTH FUND, LP* (RBog)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Issued for *ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY, LLC* (RBog)
|
|
FILING FEE Received in the amount of 402.00 by EV TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. - Receipt No. DET140695 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (RBog)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Filing Fee Not Paid. Correction due by 5/11/2022 (DPer)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by EV TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Fee Required - Fee Not Paid. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Description of the EV IP) (Holtz, Ethan)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: EV TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. v. MICHIGAN INCOME AND PRINCIPAL-PROTECTED GROWTH FUND, LP et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EV TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Ethan R. Holtz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MICHIGAN INCOME AND PRINCIPAL-PROTECTED GROWTH FUND, LP | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
