Konefe v. AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation
| Brian Konefe |
| AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation |
| 2:2022cv11004 |
| May 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Linda V Parker |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation. (Riley, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint - Partial by AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation. (Riley, Laurie)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint #8 . Accordingly, Defendant's #4 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)
|
|
Filing 8
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Batey, Scott)
|
|
Filing 7
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation identifying Corporate Parent AutoZone, Inc. for AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation. (Riley, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Ridley S. Nimmo, II on behalf of AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation. (Nimmo, Ridley)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation. (Riley, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss - Partial by AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Riley, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation) (Batey, Scott)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for *AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation * (SKra)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8905782 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Batey, Scott)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Konefe v. AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian Konefe | |
| Represented By: | Scott P. Batey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Laurie M. Riley |
| Represented By: | Ridley S. Nimmo, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
