Rajkovic v. University of Michigan
Stevan Rajkovic |
University of Michigan, Danielle Sheen and Richard S Holcomb, Jr. |
2:2022cv11007 |
May 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Denise Page Hood |
Curtis Ivy |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis in Flint to District Judge Denise Page Hood in Detroit pursuant to Administrative Order 22-AO-036. (NAhm) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Issued for *Danielle Sheen* (SSch) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued for *Richard S Holcomb, Jr* (SSch) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Richard S Holcomb, Jr served on 6/13/2022, answer due 7/5/2022; Danielle Sheen served on 6/13/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (Lawrence, David) Modified on 6/14/2022 (SSch). [Service done without summons being issued] |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Stevan Rajkovic against University of Michigan, Danielle Sheen, Richard S Holcomb, Jr. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - University of Michigan COVID-19 Vaccination Policy updated 1-11-22, #3 Exhibit B - Medical Exemption Form and Letter, #4 Exhibit C - 3-7-22 Exemption Approval Email, #5 Exhibit D - 3-8-22 Email, #6 Exhibit E - 3-10-22 Miskevich Email, #7 Exhibit F - 3-21-22 Miskevich Email, #8 Exhibit G - 4-1-22 Email String, #9 Exhibit H - 4-5-22 Email String, #10 Exhibit I - Exemption Letters, #11 Exhibit J - 4-15-22 Duckworth Email, #12 Exhibit K - May 2022 Confirming Emails, #13 Exhibit L - 5/2/22 Termination Notice) (Lawrence, David) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: David J. Masson appearing on behalf of All Defendants and certificate of service (Masson, David) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re Notice to Parties of Consent of a Civil Action before a Magistrate Judge Option, #2 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint,,,, by Stevan Rajkovic Acknowledgment of Service (Lawrence, David) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Prerana R. Bacon appearing on behalf of Stevan Rajkovic (Bacon, Prerana) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *University of Michigan* (DPer) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Stevan Rajkovic against University of Michigan with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8906620 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Washtenaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - University of Michigan COVID-19 Vaccination Policy Updated 1-1-22, #3 Exhibit B - 2-3-22 Medical Letter, #4 Exhibit C - 3-7-22 Exemption Approval Email, #5 Exhibit D - 3-8-22 Email, #6 Exhibit E - 3-10-22 Miskevich Email, #7 Exhibit F - 3-21-22 Miskevich Email, #8 Exhibit G - 4-1-22 Email String, #9 Exhibit H - 4-5-22 Email String, #10 Exhibit I - Exemption Letters, #11 Exhibit J - 4-15-22 Duckworth Email, #12 Exhibit K - May 2022 Confirming Emails, #13 Exhibit L - 5-2-22 Termination Notice) (Lawrence, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.