Nayak et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Anurakta Nayak and Sudhansu Mohan Behera |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas, MERRICK GARLAND, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Donna Campagnolo and John M. Allen |
| 2:2022cv11100 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Stephen J Murphy |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sudhansu Mohan Behera, Anurakta Nayak (Green, Brian) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney on behalf of MERRICK GARLAND served on 5/25/2022, answer due 7/25/2022. (Green, Brian) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (LGra) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (LGra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus filed by Anurakta Nayak, Sudhansu Mohan Behera against John M. Allen, Donna Campagnolo, MERRICK GARLAND, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8918265 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Washington, DC. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-H) (Green, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
