Neo Wireless LLC v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Neo Wireless, LLC
Defendant: Toyota Motor North America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Case Number: 2:2022cv11406
Filed: June 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Terrence G Berg
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2022 Filing 9 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc identifying Corporate Parent Toyota Financial Services Corporation, Corporate Parent Toyota Financial Services International Corporation for Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Steadman, Paul)
August 24, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. (Steadman, Paul)
July 22, 2022 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. (Stewart, Christopher)
July 22, 2022 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed.. (Stewart, Christopher)
July 14, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew D. Satchwell on behalf of Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. (Satchwell, Matthew)
June 28, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE to Attorneys re: MDL Docket No. 3034 (SSch)
June 28, 2022 Filing 2 Docket Sheet from Texas Eastern; Case Number 2:22-cv-00093.
June 28, 2022 Interdistrict transfer to the Eastern District of Michigan. MDL No. 3034 (klc, ) [Transferred from txed on 6/28/2022.]
June 28, 2022 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: This case has been transferred from the Eastern District of Texas. Pending motions must be refiled on this court's docket by the filing party. Attorneys not admitted to practice in this court must complete the attorney admissions application and be admitted before appearing on this court's docket. All previously filed documents can be accessed on the originating court's docket using PACER. (SSch)
March 29, 2022 Filing 1 TRANSFERREDCOMPLAINT COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8851232.), filed by Neo Wireless LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cassady, Jason) [Transferred from TXED; Case Number 2:22cv00093.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neo Wireless LLC v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neo Wireless, LLC
Represented By: Christopher S. Stewart
Represented By: Thomas John Ward, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor North America Inc.
Represented By: Matthew D. Satchwell
Represented By: Paul Richard Steadman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc
Represented By: Matthew D. Satchwell
Represented By: Paul Richard Steadman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.
Represented By: Paul Richard Steadman
Represented By: Matthew D. Satchwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation
Represented By: Matthew D. Satchwell
Represented By: Paul Richard Steadman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Represented By: Matthew D. Satchwell
Represented By: Paul Richard Steadman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?