Neo Wireless LLC v. Tesla Inc.
Plaintiff: Neo Wireless, LLC
Defendant: Tesla Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv11408
Filed: June 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Terrence G Berg
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2022 Filing 12 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Tesla Inc. (Reger, Thomas)
August 24, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Tesla Inc.. (Reger, Thomas)
July 20, 2022 Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Neo Wireless, LLC against Tesla Inc.. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - '366 Patent, #3 Exhibit 2 - '908 Patent, #4 Exhibit 3 - '941 Patent, #5 Exhibit 4 - '450 Patent, #6 Exhibit 5 - '512 Patent, #7 Exhibit 6 - '302 Patent, #8 Exhibit 7 - Chart Claim 1 '366, #9 Exhibit 8 - Chart Claim 11 '908, #10 Exhibit 9 - Chart Claim 13 '941, #11 Exhibit 10 - Chart Claim 7 '450, #12 Exhibit 11 - Chart Claim 15 '512, #13 Exhibit 12 - Chart Claim 23 '302) (Cassady, Jason)
July 14, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence Jarvis on behalf of Tesla Inc.. (Jarvis, Lawrence)
July 14, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth G. H. Ranks on behalf of Tesla Inc.. (Ranks, Elizabeth)
July 13, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Reger, II on behalf of Tesla Inc.. (Reger, Thomas)
July 7, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah E. Waidelich on behalf of Tesla Inc.. (Waidelich, Sarah)
July 7, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Michael Huget on behalf of Tesla Inc.. (Huget, J.)
June 28, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE to Attorney re: MDL Docket No. 3034 (SSch)
June 28, 2022 Filing 3 Docket Sheet from Texas Eastern; Case Number 2:22-cv-00095.
June 28, 2022 Filing 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CERTIFIED TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED. Received and Signed by MDL Panel Clerk (klc, ) [Transferred from txed on 6/28/2022.]
June 28, 2022 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: This case has been transferred from the Eastern District of Texas. Pending motions must be refiled on this court's docket by the filing party. Attorneys not admitted to practice in this court must complete the attorney admissions application and be admitted before appearing on this court's docket. All previously filed documents can be accessed on the originating court's docket using PACER. (SSch)
March 29, 2022 Filing 1 TRANSFERREDCOMPLAINT

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neo Wireless LLC v. Tesla Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neo Wireless, LLC
Represented By: Christopher S. Stewart
Represented By: Thomas John Ward, Jr
Represented By: Jason Dodd Cassady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tesla Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth G. H. Ranks
Represented By: J. Michael Huget
Represented By: Lawrence Jarvis
Represented By: Sarah E. Waidelich
Represented By: Thomas Reger, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?